Hospitals deserve their reputations for serving unhealthy, badly cooked food, a report out this week claims. More than two-thirds of people surveyed took their own food into hospital, because the meals served up were inedible, while more than half the patients asked said that they would not be happy serving the food to a child, and more than a third believed hospital food was "unacceptable".
The report, First Aid for Hospital Food, warns the NHS is wasting millions of pounds by failing to source fresh produce from local suppliers. The Soil Association, which commissioned the survey of 1,000 people, said it was "staggering" that hospitals continue to serve poor quality meals to patients.
Peter Melchett, the Soil Association's policy director said: "It's clear there are people running hospitals who don't think what they feed patients matters, hence these extraordinary appalling figures of people going into hospital and coming out more malnourished. Things you really couldn't quite believe could be true. Every hospital that hasn't got decent food should visit one that has. It's the best way to learn."
The report points out that every survey of hospital food since 1963 has concluded that meals given to recuperating patients are unhealthy and barely edible.
It says a handful of hospitals are finding that, in addition to the health benefits, investing in good food saves them millions annually as well as stimulating the local economy. Nottingham City Hospital, for example, saved £6m last year by buying produce locally instead of sourcing its food from expensive multinationals. It buys pork from a local pig farmer, allowing him to make a profit for the first time in 10 years and saving jobs on the farm.
The Cornwall Hospital Food Programme showed that hospitals spending with local suppliers pumped an additional £900,000 into the local economy. Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust gets yoghurt from a local supplier for two-thirds of the price of the nationally approved supplier.
Despite such savings, the NHS currently sources less of its food from UK producers, the proportion dropping to 64.5 per cent in 2008-09 from 70 per cent the year before. The NHS Supply Chain, which buys food for many hospitals, brought just a third of its processed potatoes from British suppliers compared with two-thirds bought by UK families. Only 5 per cent of fish served up by the NHS comes from UK fishermen, compared with 50 per cent served up in domestic households.
Figures released in December by the NHS Information Centre show a record 13,500 patients became malnourished during their hospital stay last year, while a report from within the Department of Health suggests almost 50,000 people could be suffering from malnutrition or conditions complicated by malnutrition in English hospitals.
"It is appalling to know that in this day and age in the UK a third of all adults admitted to hospital and similar care settings are already suffering from malnutrition," said Helen Davidson, the chairman of the British Dietetic Association.
"Without question, this reduces quality of life, leads to longer hospital stays and, in some circumstances, can lead to death for some of our most vulnerable citizens. In addition to the severe health impact, it is estimated that this costs the UK economy £13bn each year."
A spokesman for the Department of Health, said: "It is important that patients are given good quality food to improve their health and overall experience of being in hospital.
"Individual hospitals make independent decisions about what and how food is provided. Since April 2010, it has been a requirement of a hospital's continuing registration with the Care Quality Commission, that patients are protected from the risks of dehydration and inadequate nutrition. The commission assesses trusts against this requirement and has tough enforcement powers for cases where proper standards are not being met."
Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/, 6 February 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment